News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wind farm approved 

Wind farm approved

05 Nov, 2009 09:23 AM
The $150 million, 26-turbine Glen Innes Wind Farm project has been approved by the NSW Department of Planning, despite a campaign by some neighbours for a 2km setback and an ongoing State Parliament inquiry into rural wind farms.

The project is the first wind farm development to be approved in northern NSW and is expected to supply power to more than 25,000 homes.

Announcing the approval in a statement issued early on Tuesday, Minister for Planning Kristina Keneally said the development would support 40 construction and four ongoing jobs.

“As well as helping to secure the State’s electricity supply with green energy, the wind farm also provides an important boost for jobs and investment in the local economy," she said.

In addition the proponents, NP Power and Infigen Energy (recently replacing partners Babcock and Brown Wind Partners), would be required to pay council $75,000 a year toward a community enhancement program.

Due to “unacceptable visual and noise impacts” one of the 130m turbines was removed from the plan, Ms Keneally said.

Member for Northern Tablelands Richard Torbay said he had been informed that if the Government followed the 2km setback guidelines, in accordance with Glen Innes Severn Council’s Development Control Plan for Wind Power Generation, the development would be reduced to 16 turbines (13 if unoccupied dwellings were also considered).

“The government will now have to spend time and tax payers money in the Land and Environment Court trying to defend these poor decisions when it could have established sound guidelines to facilitate developments and have them welcomed across regional NSW,” he said.

Nearby resident Maryanne Evans said she was devastated by the news as it ignored neighbour, council and community views for a 2km setback.

“We were pleased they removed the turbine (planned to sit 900m from her house) but we still have to contend with seven other turbines within 2km,” she said. “ We are astonished that they would make this decision without waiting for the wind farm inquiry report.”

Fellow resident Ashley Peake said a tree screen advocated by the department for homes within 3km of a turbine was indicative of how little the government knew about the area. He said the turbines would sit on elevated ridges the size of a 40 storey building and trees could not block the turbines.

“The turbines will create noise and visual pollution, health effects and bring our property values down,” he said. “Just like the situation in Victoria, people will be forced out of their houses because the turbines are too close to properties and then the community suffers.”

Mayor Steve Toms said while he was disappointed the government had not enforced the 2km set back he said if all three proposed wind farms currently before the Department of Planning were approved the area would have 300 turbines, putting Glen Innes at the centre of environment and economic benefit.

“It is going to change the visual landscape, whether positive or negative,” he said.

Wind turbine host Rob Dulhunty said it was a great day for the environment and a great day for the Glen Innes community to be part of the solution.

“Considering the development application had been pending for a long time and the parliamentary inquiry and council’s DCP came about post DA they really shouldn’t apply (to this development),” he said.

Vice President of NP Power Colin Patterson said the development would be the company’s second wind farm in NSW. He said a timeframe for construction was not yet known but there was a good percentage given that local contractors would be utilised.

“One thing that should be kept in mind is that we have never got an approved project and left it on the shelf. Once approved it has always been our intention to build as quick as possible and this wind farm will be no different,” he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
single page

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Another kick in the guts for rural families, more useless wind turbines that destroy community cohension and are a health hazard.
Posted by Pete Babcock, 5/11/2009 11:01:03 AM
Ah more dodgy wind turbines that produce stuff all power. Google Waubra wind farm health issues to see the problems with living near a wind farm and google landholder contract review to see the contract broke landholders sign up too. Turbines are a legal mine field
Posted by Jack McCracken, 5/11/2009 11:11:15 AM
Wind turbines are a health hazard, mention "infra sound" to a wind company and go right off!!!
Posted by Jon Peters, 5/11/2009 11:18:39 AM
Well done Labor party another heap of votes lost here! Toss turbines go solar, infact go total solar as it eats the guts out of the 20% renewable target and makes turbines a financial flop dut to low green credit prices!!!
Posted by Ryan, 5/11/2009 11:28:38 AM
Welcome to our nightmare Maryanne. We have been trying to make government realize that these turbines make people sick and they must be placed much further away for habitable dwellings. If the state govt and federal government has their way the whole of rural Victoria will be an industrial wind factory, and not an efficient power source as overseas countries are finding out, and in 20 years time an industrial wasteland. Keep fighting these radical green idiots.
Posted by sue, 5/11/2009 11:54:17 AM
wind turbines are a drain on consumers who have to prop up this useless health hazard.
Posted by Heath, 5/11/2009 3:05:47 PM
Dont you just hate it when these press releases always tell lies about these fictitious 225,000 houses that will be supplied? Are these 25,000 houses happy to have power for about 25% of the time? Also, where do these mental giants draw the line between acceptable and unacceptable turbines? and these are only 130m monstrosities not the 150m Westwind eye sores! I guess this minister can in her tiny mind can justify stuffing up many residents for ever for the sake of 50 jobs for a month or so.
Posted by chris kirk, 5/11/2009 7:06:39 PM
I don't blame the Government as much as I do the selfish neighbours who have allowed these turbines to be built on their land. The Labour Government has contempt for rural people and this is just another example. Without these money hungry landowners it wouldn't go ahead. They have no regard for the environment, neighbours or the community they live in. Did they ask the wind company to compensate their neighbours? NO. They have no morals at all and are going to make money at their neighbours expense, nice people! I hope they realise that after these huge towers are built and people can see just how bad they are, they will have no friends left and will be the most unliked people in the district. It will really grate at people every day when they have to put up with the noise and visual pollution while the people responsible get paid every year. I hope the council realises that when property values decrease because of this, landowners should and will fight to get a decrease in their rates. The benefit to the community is small and very short lived, but the pain will go on forever.
Posted by Scott, 16/11/2009 12:41:58 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
This a 2008 photo of Ashley Peake and Maryanne Evans of the Landscape Guardians with Mrs Evans house in the background. The removal of a turbine proposed for the hill behind the house from the project was a condition of approval by the department. Photo: Naomi Davidson
This a 2008 photo of Ashley Peake and Maryanne Evans of the Landscape Guardians with Mrs Evans house in the background. The removal of a turbine proposed for the hill behind the house from the project was a condition of approval by the department. Photo: Naomi Davidson

Most popular articles

 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...